A friend forwarded a nice ad about a Jamaican who didn't believe in caps to post. So I followed. Sorry, I cannot find the original.


hey sexy ladies of craigslist! how are your doing?, i'm gonna keep it short and to the point and free of caps. just looking to meet some cool people. i'm 38 yrs old, originally from michigan, but i reside in adams morgan. i'm 6ft and change. i work. I like to cook, read, eskimo face-pulling competitions, and from time to time, rubbing my crotch on women on metro during rush hour, or whatever the mood desires. i would like to know some things about you, like your politics and chest size, and if the feeling is mutual, we could have sex from behind on my kitchen table.

in Adams Morgan 73 inches average thick Michigan fella .. whenever

Come and get fucking in Leesburg by this really short dude (permalink).

come drink with this Michigan fella and maybe I’ll make you dinner or something good ladies and maybe we can do “it”.......tall, smells ok, whenever!!!!
--
Once you go mitten, you're forever smitten

this may upset ppl with enormous man crushing gigantic breast

Challenged speller, boob lover, seeks seeks women who don't have boobs of A-cup or less(?) to fulfill fantasy(?) (permalink)...

but please ppl with enormous man crushing gigantic breast don't send me emails calling me names like, for example, sexist small breast liker or chauvinist piggie admirer of smaller non-man crushing gigantic breast and what not...
any ways,
I want to meet someone with with smaller breast. I know this sounds a bit weerd but just hear me out first...

It's just that the last several women Ive been with have all had enormous man crushing gigantic breast, i.e. they were overstocked in the breast dept. I beleave I was man crushed by all their breast...

normally I do not care about getting man crushed (obviously) but I am actually a bit picky about the physical qualities of my women (I like attractive and thin), but after a while I would like to meet someone who plays to my fantasies a bit, is that really so wrong? Im only human after all...

I'm not asking for women with non-enormous, non-man crushing non-gigantic breast.

I promise Im not a creep and Im not bad to look at., I have pictures to back it up. but only if you have pics too (face pics). Right now I have a pictures of a foot to show how endowed I am in my foot.

Just watch me dance the YMCA

Self-professed nice guy seeks attractive woman to watch him engage in an act of self-love. You'll be amazed by his ejaculate (permalink).

Hello,

I am a very nice professional guy. I am looking for a girl that wants to watch. Yes watch. I love to dance the YMCA and want to have a beautiful girl watch me. I put some Village People on the stereo and just sort of lose myself in the dance. You can feel free to do what you want too, even masturbate. Heck I don't mind. I have my own apartment and am extremely friendly person. This might sound bizarre but it really is exciting. Did I mention that I was nice and friendly?

Send a photo and we can arrange from there. I have not dance in 3 days and you will be surprised at enthusiasm.

Cheers

Do you prefer smooth or chunky? (among other ponderables)

Deep thoughts and other idiocy...(permalink)

Myself, I prefer the latter, b/c has much more mouth feel and the possibility encountering chunky pieces of peanuts than smooth peanut butter. Let me explain.

Both chunky and smooth peanut butter can be an excellent component in, say, a peanut butter sandwich. However, I think chunky peanut butter represents its nature in a more true manner than smooth peanut butter.

It was Ferdinand de Saussure in his seminal treatise (heh, seminal) "Legume et Parole: Écrits de beurre de cacahuètes générale proposed that the connection between the signifier and the signified is arbitrary, and that peanut butter is innately chunky (though the mental concept "chunky" is just an arbitrary term used to describe peanut butter with hunks of peanuts suspended in the mix). Anyway, it is society that over-pulverizes it, making it smooth.

Some argue that smooth peanut butter is, the fully-realized product, and hence superior. However, they are flat out wrong. The implication of such an assertion is that the content of a product, its flavor, its enjoyability, its very soul, is improved by becoming entirely removed from its nature.

Thoughts?

And once you've finished that essay question, try this one.

If you could go back in time to 8 PM at any point in my life, and you are cooking me dinner, should I bring a bottle of red or white wine?